By
Guillermo Rueda
A
country is a complex system consisting of a set of elements
connected by multiple and non-linear relationships. Technology
foresight, commonly defined as a systematic process to identify
critical technologies [1] [2]
that will allow countries to develop consistently and reach
their goals, has been growing in importance during the last two
decades.
Technology
foresight (TF) has been used to identify critical
technologies that may be considered as leverage points of
countries as a whole system. In recent years, many countries have
developed foresight exercises to identify scientific and technology
opportunities for medium and long-term goals [2].
Japan
led the process in the ‘70s, undertaking the Japanese Technology
Forecast Delphi as its first effort, which surveyed a more than
30-year time span, covering 644 topics and using nearly 2,500
participants [3]. The exercise has been repeated every five years,
and in the last exercise (2003) it covered more than 1,000 topics
with over 4,000 participants.
Soon
other countries like Korea, Thailand, Germany, Australia, Austria,
France, Holland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, New Zealand,
Sweden, U.S. and the U.K. started similar activities.
In
the case of Latin America, an important initiative came from UNIDO,
part of the United Nations (UN) since 1985, in cooperation with the
International Centre for Science and High Technology (ICS).
In Trieste, Italy (1999) UNIDO came forward with a proposal
known as the Technology Foresight Initiative for Latin America
and the Caribbean (TFI LAC),
the main purpose of which was to promote industrialization in the
following group of Latin American and Caribbean countries:
Latin
American countries involved in the UNIDO/ICS’s TF
Initiative
|
|
Argentina
|
Guatemala
|
|
Brazil
|
Panama
|
|
Uruguay
|
Peru
|
|
Venezuela
|
Costa
Rica
|
|
Mexico
|
El
Salvador
|
|
Bolivia
|
Paraguay
|
|
Chile
|
Ecuador
|
|
Colombia
|
Cuba
|
At
the present stage, as described in [http://www.unido.org/doc/4219],
countries like Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela and Uruguay have
completed the preparation stage of the process, including plans of
actions, schedules, and national inventories. However, countries
like Colombia, Mexico, Bolivia, and Chile have just finished their
foresight inventories and are developing their plans of actions in
order to start the preparation stage.
Several
IT tools are used to facilitate data gathering in the TFI LAC
process. They are using First Class groupware as an Intranet
communication tool and specialized software for Delphi’s
experiences called Strategylet
(online software for strategic planning and foresight analysis) and Surveylet
(on-line software for brainstorming and SWOT analysis).
Verifying
if these initiatives have produced positive results and contrasting
them with the initial objectives is very premature because the main
processes are still in the early stages. Also, previous experience
has demonstrated that time delays are always embedded in the
technology foresight process [4]. UNIDO’s Annual Reports from 2001
and 2002 highlighted some of the main contributions for Latin
American and Caribbean countries. However, it is not clear if they
are effects from independent and/or previous projects or if they
came from UNIDO/ICS TFI LAC’s initiative [5] [6].
Finally,
what is true is that the art of identifying “critical
technologies” as leverage points may produce important changes for
developing countries, improving social and economical conditions.
The ability for developing countries to concentrate their efforts
and knowledge, tacit and
explicit, may redefine economies in the medium and long term. A
good example is expressed in the case of India—a country with more
than 400
million people living on less than US $1 per day and containing 36
percent of the poor people in the world—which leads the world’s software
industry.
References:
[1]
Technology Foresight: A UNIDO/ICS Initiative for Latin America and
the Caribbean. Workshop Proceedings. 1999.
[2]
Foresight for Regional Development Network (FOREN). A Practical
Guide to Regional Foresight. European Commission Research
Directorate General, STRATA Program. 2001.
[3]
Kuwahara, T. (1999). "Technology Forecasting Activities in
Japan." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 60(1):
5-14.
[4]
NISTEP, Report No. 52. The Sixth technology Forecast Survey - Future
Technology in Japan Toward the Year 2025. 1997. For more information
visit http://www.nistep.go.jp/index-e.html.
[5]
Annual Report of UNIDO, 2002, pp. 38-40. For details visit http://www.unido.org/file-storage/download/?file%5fid=11100
[6]
Annual Report of UNIDO, 2001, pp. 38-39. For details visit http://www.unido.org/userfiles/timminsk/Annual_Report_2001_Eng.pdf
To contact author please send e-mail to
grueda@pdx.edu
Printable
PDF version
Back to top
|