| By
Guillermo Rueda
A
country is a complex system consisting of a set of elements
connected by multiple and non-linear relationships. Technology
foresight, commonly defined as a systematic process to identify
critical technologies [1] [2]
that will allow countries to develop consistently and reach
their goals, has been growing in importance during the last two
decades.
Technology
foresight (TF) has been used to identify critical
technologies that may be considered as leverage points of
countries as a whole system. In recent years, many countries have
developed foresight exercises to identify scientific and technology
opportunities for medium and long-term goals [2].
Japan
led the process in the ‘70s, undertaking the Japanese Technology
Forecast Delphi as its first effort, which surveyed a more than
30-year time span, covering 644 topics and using nearly 2,500
participants [3]. The exercise has been repeated every five years,
and in the last exercise (2003) it covered more than 1,000 topics
with over 4,000 participants.
Soon
other countries like Korea, Thailand, Germany, Australia, Austria,
France, Holland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, New Zealand,
Sweden, U.S. and the U.K. started similar activities.
In
the case of Latin America, an important initiative came from UNIDO,
part of the United Nations (UN) since 1985, in cooperation with the
International Centre for Science and High Technology (ICS).
In Trieste, Italy (1999) UNIDO came forward with a proposal
known as the Technology Foresight Initiative for Latin America
and the Caribbean (TFI LAC),
the main purpose of which was to promote industrialization in the
following group of Latin American and Caribbean countries:
There are
important factors why India has assumed the world’s leading
position in the software industry.
The reasons are multiple and are associated with the
strategic planning processes which place special emphasis on three
main factors: quality
factors, government policies, and the education system.
IT
Quality Factors
International
standards are considered today as the essential requirement to
compete in international markets. India has 42 companies satisfying
the international software standards from the Software Engineering
Institute - Capability Maturity Model (SEI CMM) Level 5 from the
total of 62 in the world, representing 68 percent of the total
number of companies. Also, 316 Indian software companies have
acquired quality certifications. Indian IT companies serve more than
50% of the Fortune companies.
Tax
Incentives
The
Indian government is promoting activities that leverage social and
economic development through tax incentives. For example, there is a
ten-year tax holiday for ventures engaged
in developing and/or operating an infrastructure facility, a ten-year
tax holiday for companies that generate and/or distribute power, a
five-year tax holiday for telecom activities including Internet
services and broadband networks, and a five-year tax holiday for
other new industries. Also, companies under the umbrella of software
technology parks (STP) get additional benefits [3] as follows:
-
100%
foreign equity permitted;
-
Duty
free import;
-
Corporate
income tax exempted up to 90%;
-
Dedicated
data communication links; and
-
Export
certification at a single point.
Human
Pool
Human
resources are considered India’s most important asset. Education
is regarded as a leverage point, summarized in the following
statements [4]:
-
India
has around 250 universities and 11,549 colleges.
-
India
has nearly 600,000 IT professionals.
-
India
has the second largest English speaking population in the world.
Indian engineers use English as a first language.
-
India
is recognized for its strong education system, which emphasizes
mathematical and logical reasoning.
In
summary, India is leading the world software industry because the
country identified critical requirements and has invested necessary
resources in terms of people, time and money along with a consistent
government policy that fosters the foreign IT industry.
____________________
References
[1]
CIA- The Word FactBook 2002. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/in.html.
[2]
Nasscom-McKinsey. Strategic Review 2002.
[3]
Nasscom. Please visit http//www.nasscom.com for detail information.
[4]
http://www.infosys.com
To contact author
please send e-mail to grueda@pdx.edu
Printable
PDF version
|